

With interest rates falling, and employee ownership increasing, we have seen more opportunities for EO companies to utilise third-party funding both to support the transition to EO, to repay their deferred consideration early, to provide financial support, or to enable ambitions for growth and expansion.
In this article we reflect back on a session at the 2023 Employee Ownership Association annual conference, when Sue Lawrence facilitated a session on funding for employee owned companies.
Here we share a few key messages and tips that came from the discussions with panelists Oliver Wilson from Shawbrook Bank, Mike Dinnell from ThinCats and Gaynor Dykes from the British Business Bank, as well as observations from our experience with EO companies.
Funding the Transition to EO
As employee ownership becomes more prevalent as an ownership structure in the UK, and more founders are utilising it for their succession plans, lenders are becoming more available.
As with any lending, having a good financial plan, evidence of past trading and cashflow is part of the requirements for funding. EO lenders note that lending to EO from their perspective, has the same criteria around feasibility and future borrowing.
What has been found is that companies transitioning to EO may not have previously accessed funding, other than overdraft facilities. As a result, they may be unprepared for the level of financial transparency that is required to underpin their application. This is a different conversation to that held with banks providing a current account. It is more strategic, focused not just on day-to-day activity, but also plans for the future - maintaining and developing a healthy cashflow to fund the repayments, whilst continuing to develop and grow the business.
Those that have accessed 3rd party funding before may have relied on personal guarantees from the founders. These guarantees may no longer be available once the founder has sold their shares into the EOT, or may have reduced benefit if the guarantor is now a minority shareholder, or is increasingly having a reduced influence on the business. Plus, the founder themselves should consider carefully whether providing a guarantee is in their own best interests as they seek to reduce their connection to the business. It may also not be in the best interests of the business to have an additional reliance on an exited founder.
Funders also note that the options around equity lending are also constrained under an EO structure, where the trust is the majority owner, and minority shareholder interests may be diluted in terms of priority. Certainly, having a lender in a senior position in any waterfall repayment schedules may create a complex equity model. It should be noted that there are EO specific lenders who support transitions financially by taking a minority shareholding.
Lenders also note that the financial modelling on any lending will be robust. Seeking 3rd party funding is not a route to save a drowning business.
Funding Beyond Transition
One standout was that funding isn’t just for the transition to EO. As with any business, 3rd party funding is often sought to enable and facilitate growth. With a new leadership team, who don’t have the history of setting up the business and the risks involved at early stage evolution, there is often a different attitude to risk and opportunity, with external funding seen as a cost of doing business not a risk of personal loss.
The lenders on the panel were clear that they look at both the financials, as well as the new leadership team when funding employee owned businesses, taking a more collaborative approach and seeking to understand the drivers and opportunities as a whole, not simply the ability to repay.
Not all funders are the same, so it is worth looking beyond your usual banking relationships if you’re an EO business looking to grow.
From the borrowers’ perspective it is important to consider the increased oversight that will come with the borrowing, as well as the ability to repay. All lenders, to any company, will be seeking reassurance that the business is continuing to trade well, and has sufficient cash flow and reserves to maintain the business whilst repaying the debt. This reassurance will come with covenants and expectations of regular financial reporting to the lender.
Funding to Repay Deferred Consideration
As interest rates have fallen, EO companies with residual deferred consideration to pay, especially those that have high interest rates attached to that repayment, may consider replacing the deferred consideration with a bank loan or other third party funding structure.
The benefit of this is that it gives a neutral lender with no personal history or emotional ties with the business. It may provide lower repayment rates, more flexible terms or a guaranteed repayment schedule. Or it may come with wider business related ladening such as asset financing, or revolving credit.
The downside may be increased reporting and due diligence, but both of these aspects may be easier to provide after a few years of transparency in reporting to employees.
Often this route is an opportunity for owner vendors to exit the business more quickly, potentially driven by personal circumstances that have altered since the move to EO.
It is also an opportunity for the new leadership team to take ownership of the running of the business without vendor reserved matters, which would fall away when the EO sale terms are fulfilled. This may also be an opportunity to revie the membership of the trust board given the vendor would no longer have a financial interest in the business.
In many cases, it is simply that third-party lending is a cheaper option.
Lender Compliance Processes
One area that can be both time consuming and frustrating for EO borrowers is that the understanding of the ownership structure may not fit into the rigid bank KYC processes and on-boarding procedures. There is rarely a box to tick on the ownership structure that accurately explains the trust structure with beneficiaries being the employees.
We have seen lenders seeking copies of the trust deed, or a list of named beneficiaries of the trust for clarification. As a borrower, beware if your bank lender asks for details of all beneficiaries, it is often an indication that the EO ownership structure is not understood by the banks compliance team. In these scenarios it may be easier to speak with your relationship manager, escalate the issue, or consider an alternative EO friendly lender.
IDT has an explanation sheet for their EO clients that can be shared with lenders which explains EO in legal and practical terms so that they can understand that EO structures are supported by legislation and the UK government, and have a recognised legal structure.
Concluding Remarks
If you’re an EO company still paying back the deferred consideration, remember that when this is finished, there will be more cash in the business that could potentially support current borrowing. Speak to the EO experienced lenders about tailoring your repayment schedules around your repayment dates.
If you are post-deferred consideration, borrowing under an EO structure may require a bit more explanation of your legal structure, but should be considered as part of your general business and financial reviews.
External funding can release opportunities for growth or expansion of the business, or can relieve short-term financial pressures. It is an option that is increasingly readily accessible for EO companies as understanding of the legal structure increases.
If you’re considering seeking external funding as an SME, a good starting place is the British Business Bank Finance hub: https://www.british-business-bank.co.uk/business-guidance
IDT and its members are not financial advisers, or experts in financial matters, and nothing in this article should be read as providing funding or financial advice. Companies should seek the advice of financial and funding experts when considering their borrowing opportunities.