Blog Post

Governance Tips for EO Companies

IDT • 16 January 2025

Getting the governance model of your employee owned company right can be invaluable in gaining understanding and using resources effectively. Here we provide a few tips on EO governance models.

Let’s start at the beginning – What is Governance?

The Chartered Governance Institute (ICSA) defines governance as:

‘Governance is a system that provides a framework for managing organisations. It identifies who can make decisions, who has the authority to act on behalf of the organisation and who is accountable for how an organisation and its people behave and perform.’

Taking this one step further, the governance of an organisation can be equated to being its skeleton – a core part of its functioning but, when working smoothly, it shouldn’t be seen. Without it the body of the organisation cannot function, it falls apart and is disconnected with time spent shoring up areas that, if connected to a robust structure, wouldn’t take so much time and resource away from creating a successful business, however that is defined.


Governance in Practice

All good so far, but what does that mean in practice?

Governance isn’t just administration or support, it is evidenced by a board, a leadership team and forums where decisions are made, not just those related to operations but also the strategic direction of the organisation.

So starting with the above definition and the wider view, who makes the decisions? Who has the authority to act?

Usually this would be the board of directors. In smaller companies it may be the founder, or a small group of senior leaders, whether appointed as statutory directors or not. In larger companies it will be the executive directors, with the board including non-executive directors discussing, challenging, agreeing and making significant decisions, whether they are operational or strategic.

In an employee owned company it is still the operating board that makes the decisions … not the trustees or the employee body, which is often a misconception in companies that have recently transitioned to ownership through an employee ownership trust.

It is the group of executives who lead operations, have oversight of all the functions and ensure the business runs smoothly that are the visible leaders of any company. They also set the future direction of the business, through the near term budget setting and business plans, and agreeing the longer term strategy. In effect, they ensure that the company is working effectively, is placing its resources in the right place, has an eye on the future and is fit for purpose.


IDT Tip: Ensure your board as a collectively group have the skills to fulfil their roles and responsibilities. Consider board evaluations. Don’t be afraid to welcome in a Non-Executive Director to bolster your boards’ expertise or bring a broader perspective, it may be more effective and cheaper than a raft of subject matter expert consultants.


The Role of the EO Trustees

So far so good with an operating board and shareholders outside of the day-to-day operations of the organisation. But what about EO companies, where the shareholders are the employees, represented by the trust board?

In the majority of EO companies, though not all, the employees are represented by a trust company, with a board of directors who act as the trustees. These trustees are usually a combination of any of the following: founders, management, employees, former employees, company advisers and independent trustees with no former connection to the company.

The composition of the trust board is many and varied and often unique to each organisation.

What should unite them is a having a clear purpose – acting as the representative of the employees as owners.

They should also be united by having a responsibility for three things:


  1. Oversight of the current health of the organisation;
  2. Understanding of, and supportive challenge on, the future direction of the organisation; and
  3. Oversight of the effectiveness of the operating board in delivering (1) and (2).
Aligned to this, trustees should ensure that the Company is run aligned to its purpose and values, and that employees have an opportunity to participate in a meaningful way.

Too frequently trustees, whether on their own volition, as a result of their differing roles and conflicts, or at the behest of an operating board, stray into the operational decision making and strategy setting that sits with the board. The result is that the differing roles and responsibilities for these two forums becomes confused, both for their members and for the employees.

The outcome is that both forums spend precious time overlapping in their discussions of the same topics, duplicating effort and potentially getting mired in a lack of forward momentum as the ultimate decision maker is not clearly identified.

For clarity, from a governance perspective, the trustees should be the back-stop. The forum for supportive challenge of board decisions and how those decisions have been made. The group that, once feedback from that challenge has been accepted and, if appropriate, acted upon by the operating board, will support the communication of the decision made and communicated by the board.

There is a need to ensure that trustee actions and communications don’t undermine the operating board, particularly where that board may be recently constituted as a result of conversion to EO. The trustee role as one of oversight is less action driven than that of the board. Actions are taken when necessary, but not as a regular occurrence, and not as part of the day-to-day operations of the organisation.

Trustees should always be cognisant to not communicate in a way that confuses their role, overlaps with that of the operating board, or undermines the leadership team of the organisation.

The trust should have a clear and specific role in representing the employees, both current and future, as beneficiaries of the trust (the beneficial owners), and this distinction should be at the heart of all their discussions and communications with employees.


IDT Tip: Have a standard agenda for your trustee meetings that reflects the 3 areas of responsibility – current health, future direction, effectiveness of the board – discussing each of these topics in depth as and when required, not equally at all meetings.


Implementing or Reviewing EO Governance

It may sound counter-intuitive to the proposition of IDT as a collective of independent trustees, but we would recommend that all companies consider their governance structure before they appoint an independent trustee, or at least when they are considering changing the composition of the trustee board.

Why? Because until you are clear on the roles and responsibilities of the various forums, you don’t know what skills you will need, what contribution you are expecting and what deliverables you expect from your trustees.

Your legal documentation will only take you so far in identifying what these various roles and responsibilities are. What it won’t do is provide the practical application of the legal framework. Often the legal documentation requires the appointment of an independent trustee. If so, make sure that one of your first tasks as a trustee board is to understand what the role of the trustee is. An experienced independent trustee will be invaluable in creating this understanding.

Working through where the decision making sits, who sets the strategy, what should be referred to trustees (and critically what shouldn’t), how the employee voice will be captured, are all key questions.

Recently transitioned EO companies, or those that are in the planning stage, should consider what they already have in place, particularly what works effectively already. Good EO governance should take this and layer EO on top of this existing robust foundation.

Too frequently, companies transition into EO and believe they have to change everything. But being in a position that is strong enough to move into ownership by employees means that something is working well. Why would you stop doing this?

We frequently work with EO companies to review, create, assess or document their governance structure, either as an independent trustee or as a consultant. It may seem a dry topic that isn’t a priority, but once it is in place and communicated to all employees, it can be used effectively and should help to avoid misunderstanding, duplication and resource stretch. In fact, by communicating it to all employees, with the full understanding of the management team and the appointed trustees, it can help to create a true understanding of what employee ownership means.

As a hint, governance reviews look at the roles, responsibilities and communications between the three main forums within an employee organisation – the operating board, the trustees and the employees.


IDT Tip: Review your governance framework occasionally, and be clear where roles, responsibilities and decision making rests … and communicate this with all employees. If you’re newly transitioned, go through this exercise and communicate it widely. If your EO is more mature, consider reviewing this occasionally to ensure it remains fit for purpose and is supporting, not hindering, the business. Consider incorporating it into your employee handbook and induction process.


Conflicts in Governance

The role of the trustee is complex, especially when its members frequently have two hats to wear:

  • founder/ recipient of outstanding consideration / trustee
  • director / manager / trustee;
  • employee / trustee;
  • former employee / company pensioner / trustee;
  • company adviser (lawyer, accountant, etc) / trustee.

As trustees representing the employees as beneficiaries., internal trustees often have to learn the difference in their role between being an employee and being an employee trustee. Crucially, their trustee role is to represent all employees equally, not just the subset that an internal trustee, whether a director, management or employee trustee, works alongside, or is responsible for.

For a semi-independent trustee, such as a company adviser, their benefit to fellow trustees is from their expertise as a lawyer, accountant or as a knowledgeable ‘friend’ of the company, with an existing knowledge and understanding of the business. However, this existing knowledge also means that they may have a conflict in their role, especially if they continue as an adviser to the company or they maintain a close relationship with a former owner. It is this conflict that may result in them acting as if the company had not transferred into employee ownership. In some cases, they may also not have any wider experience of employee owned companies or acting as a trustee. This is not always the case, and there are many semi-independent trustees who fulfil the role excellently, but this conflict is one that should be considered at some point during their term.

The only trustee truly not conflicted is the independent trustee, who should be able to bring best practice through their personal knowledge of EO companies, trustee decision making, governance and related experience, employee communications and expertise from their wider career.


IDT Tip: Look at the composition of your trust board in relation to its purpose, roles and responsibilities. Does this forum have the combined skills to function effectively as representatives of the shareholders? Have you really identified the conflicts, been clear about these, and ensured that the beneficiaries as a whole are represented? And do this exercise on a regular basis.


The Employee Voice and Governance

The crucial part of being an EO company is that your employees should have a voice and this shouldn’t be lost in your governance framework.

Employees will already have opinions and ideas about how things could be done better. Your governance model needs to be able to work these into the decision making process, the discussions and the actions of the company.

But crucially, it needs to be clear that there is still a board that leads the business, that takes the tough decisions, that drives the direction of travel. The board has full knowledge, can connect the dots, can review from a position of knowledge of the whole company and how it inter-connects. It is not constrained by considering matters from a single functional perspective, or one team.

Employees should have a voice, certainly, but their key role is to understand their role in the company, how this fits into the company purpose and how, by working at their best, they are contributing to the collective success. Beyond this, their ideas are invaluable and should be encouraged, but every idea has its day and sometimes that day may not be today.

From a leadership perspective, encourage and welcome those ideas. Consider asking for employee contribution on subjects that the board is discussing. For example, if as a board you are struggling to recruit in a competitive market, ask your employees for their ideas and suggestions, their different viewpoint may identify excellent alternative solutions.

Don’t just refer employee, wellbeing, HR related and social matters to your employees. Share knowledge of the company by getting their input and feedback on business related matters. Through doing this your employees will gain a greater understanding of the challenges in place and the opportunities that your company provides to them.

Bring employees, whether directly, through a formal forum or topic based working groups, into your discussions. Engage with them and welcome input. But crucially, give feedback. If the time for one of their suggestions isn’t today, say why not, but keep it for future consideration.


IDT Tip: find a way to encourage and accept employee contributions that supports, enhances and fits in with the governance framework, whether this is via an employee council, working groups, performance reviews, workshops, ideas boxes, surveys or one of the other many means of engaging and getting feedback.


In conclusion, and reverting back to the analogy with the skeleton … be clear on how your skeleton fits together and understand what each part has responsibility for. As with a skeleton, if part of it breaks, for example if the board needs additional expertise, if a trustee resigns, if the employee voice is not being heard, mend it as soon as possible.

Long term issues not mended will remain and will gradually erode the effectiveness of the governance framework. They will also take more time and resource to mend in the future and could create an even greater issue if not addressed in a timely manner. Like a broken bone that hasn’t healed, the dull pain will eventually turn into a greater distraction that could compromise the whole organisation.

Having a robust, healthy governance skeleton will be an effective support for your organisation. Understanding and communicating your governance model, and putting it into practice, will enable your organisation to focus on the excitement and energy in making it even more successful as an employee owned company, with even greater contribution by all your employees.


Independent Directors and Trustees is a collective of experienced independent trustees who share their knowledge for their personal development, as well as for the benefit of their EO clients. If you would like to know more, read through our website or email us at info@directorsandtrustees.co.uk to arrange a no obligation chat.


22 January 2025
Agulhas Applied Knowledge was founded in January 2003 and became employee owned in December 2020. Here Nigel Thornton , one of the 3 founder vendors, kindly shares his journey to making the decision to sell to an EOT, and beyond to its current position as an EOT, B-Corp certified company with the founders stepping back and a new leadership team in place. Why did you originally decide to sell to an EOT, and do you now believe that it was the right decision? I haven't regretted the choice to sell Agulhas to an EOT for one minute. Many years before we made the decision, we had talked to other founders of companies similar to ours, and heard how they were all struggling with the challenge of transition. I knew for a long time that we would have to come to a point where we did sell. We had three choices; the first was to wind the company down. The second was to look for a buyer, probably to a much larger company. And the third, thanks to the 2014 act, was the option to sell to the employees through the mechanism of an EOT. After living and breathing Agulhas for many years, the idea of winding down just didn't seem right, so we looked at the second two options more carefully. Once the three founders talked to others about selling out to a larger company (and we’d had some interest), or getting a venture capital injection, we realized it wasn’t an attractive option for us. We would end up doing the bidding of the buyer through the workout period, being vulnerable, really, to the new owners’ whims. A buyer would likely fire most of the staff, retaining only the seniors, and the company would be gone. From companies that had got venture capital funds we’d seen we’d be forced to grow rapidly to meet an investor’s requirements and become driven by the bottom line. In both these cases, what we'd created that was unique about Agulhas would be lost. We didn't want that to happen. So it became clear fairly quickly that the choice to sell to an EOT seemed best. It meant that the company could work effectively on the kind of things that we've always thought important. The culture of the company would be maintained. We could evolve from where we were rather than be forced to change. And actually it was better than that. It wasn’t the best worst option, quite the reverse. Soon after we made the choice to go for an EOT, and began working through what it meant, we realised that doing so was indeed consistent with our values. It was an expression of who we already were and the founders’ beliefs. And, as its worked out, I think we’ve found that for Agulhas, becoming an EOT was not as great a step as it might have been culturally, or practically. What stage is the Company at now, and what is your ongoing involvement, if any? We’re four years into our EOT life, and about halfway through the payoff of the deferred consideration. It’s gone slower that we’d hoped as our main client is the UK Government and there’s been a lot of disruption to our expected cashflow since December 2020 when we became an EOT. I've handed over being the CEO to Lauren Pett who had been our Chief Operating Officer. We did it in a very Agulhas way, evolving and having a phased process of her taking over. Since we became an EOT, the role of the staff has been strengthened through what we call the Co-Owners Forum (COF). This is still evolving, with informal and more formal working groups aligned to both areas of strategic priority for the company, and themes important to the staff. And the EOT has driven us to put in place more structured governance. We’re in the process of further developing the leadership roles in the company - what the oversight of the company board and the Trust Board means in practice - to ensure that there is a robust architecture to go forward towards and beyond Freedom Day. That’s meant a structured change to the roles that the three founders have, with us more clearly taking an oversight role through the board of Directors and the Trust Board, rather than day to day running of the company. Together with one of the other co-founders, Catherine Cameron, I’ve gone down to a four-day week. That’s for the good of us and the company, and is a deliberate internal and external signal. Beyond the CEO functions, one of the things that has enabled me to step back is the fact that we've employed people who can take on key tasks I used to do, for instance, finance and IT. I think its not unusual that if a company has grown around you, a founder ends up being a Jack or Jill of all trades. And a key thing for me is I’ve stepped out of managing our biggest client, which I’d done for over a decade. Such stepping back is the right thing to do, although doing so can be hard, it is important. When somebody asks me to do something, I’m finding myself saying, well, actually, that's not my problem anymore, go and ask so and so, it’s their job. It takes a while to get people used to that (and people still find it difficult sometimes) but, as a founder, you’ve been the last person that everybody looks to for so long it’s a hard habit for everyone to break. What have been the challenges since the transition, from your perspective as a Founder? I think when you have spent many, many years being where the buck stops, it's hard then not to think of you yourself in that role anymore. Just because it's habit, you think you are responsible for solving things because, actually, you have been responsible for solving things! You've woken up at three o'clock in the morning because it has been your responsibility to worry about whatever the company is facing, be it a cash flow issue or a delivery issue or a sticky relationship with a key client. So the first thing you've got to do is actually change where your head is at. And that's been a challenge for me. So I’ve needed to change my headspace, and also my actions. It also takes time for people to believe you when you say you aren’t going to be around forever and that you do want to step back. I think it's also a difficulty, or certainly one that I've had, which is to know when to say something and when not to say something, when to intervene and when not to intervene. You've got to let the new leadership take the decisions. And sometimes those decisions are not going to be the same as that you would have made, and sometimes there are going to be mistakes that you might see coming and you might warn people about, but actually they've got to go through and learn from the experience in the same way that I've learned over many years. And the best teacher is, in the end, experience. So it's important to calibrate when to keep your mouth shut, and crucially to be available to the new leadership if they want to ask you a question, ask what you think, to be helpful and supportive, so that they know that you have got their back if necessary. It’s delicate and I haven’t always got it right. The key issue for me is knowing that the company is safe; and that’s essentially about knowing that the beliefs, people and systems are sound, and that as far as possible there’s a secure commercial outlook. What have been the positive highlights that you can share with others? At each of the last three company away days, I've said a version of the same thing which is that 20 plus years ago, when we founded the company, if you had told me that Agulhas Applied Knowledge would have the number of staff we have, our diversity, the level of energy and interest they show in the work, and that we would have a portfolio that is as wide and interesting (and if I may say as influential) as we have, I probably wouldn't have believed you. We founded Agulhas because (apart from probably being unemployable by anyone else!) we wanted to do interesting and impactful work. We never set out as the founders to create a company that Agulhas has become. A lot of the recent change is down to the energy of our CEO, Lauren, along with the rest of our team, and the energy and creativity that being an EOT engenders. They and us have built on the foundations we created. And Agulhas has become something bigger than me or the founders; it's beyond us, and that is fantastic. The employee ownership trust creates a whole new dynamism and crystallizes the company as no longer about who we are, but about the collective energy and commitment of the entire workforce of Agulhas, our beliefs, values and its culture. And that is amazing. Truly amazing! As a Founder, and Seller, what advice would you give to leadership teams of an EO business? Firstly, don't rush. Set a clear direction, but realise the wheel can take time to turn. All the change, all the all the evolution of your company to be a fully fledged EOT is not going to happen overnight, and different parts of it will grow at different paces. There will be hiccups along the way. Which leads to the second point, its important therefore to start the process early and allow things to work through! My guess is that many founders start too late, often perhaps too close to the time when they should be moving on. Thirdly, don't be greedy. If you're greedy, if you want your payout early, if you want a lot of money, that's probably not a good thing. We had to slow down our deferred consideration repayment because our expected cashflow was heavily impacted, first by COVID and then by political machinations in the UK. We had to manage our payoff at a slower phase than we expected. I think those who look for too much money or want it too quickly run into trouble. Fourthly I think it's very important to be clear about the beliefs and values of the company; for us that was easy because our job has always been very clearly value driven. It's very important to get a sense of who you are as a company, your values, your culture, so that that can be shared amongst everybody. And if somebody comes into your company, its clear they're buying into that – and being an EOT is now who we are. Very soon after becoming an EOT we also applied for and became B-Corp certified (with a very high score I might say!). That was very good for us as the combination of both EOT and B Corp was a clear public declaration of what we stand for and communicated the identity of Agulhas internally and externally. Fifthly, get the governance right. That took us a bit, but we are well on the way. A long time ago as a young management consultant in one of the Big Four, I realised that most organisational problems boil down to two issues; role clarity and effective communication. Get those both right through the transition from a company that relies on the founders to one that is mature and no longer dependent on you, and you’ll not go far wrong. Agulhas Applied Knowledge was founded in January 2003 and became employee owned in December 2020. A research, evaluation, and consultancy specializing in international development and social policy, Agulhas is based in the UK working across the world with a variety of clients including governments, UN Agencies, NGOs, and international organizations. www.agulhas.co.uk Agulhas Applied Knowledge Trustee Limited has had an IDT independent trustee appointed to their trust board since July 2022.
by Shaun Goodwin 22 January 2025
A trustees perspective on why the business should come first to enable employee benefit
by Sam Moles 22 November 2024
Through personal knowledge and experience, the author, Sam Moles, reflects and expands on one of the core expectations of EO - transparent communication and employee engagement.
11 October 2024
Our Trustee appointment process is designed to meet client deadlines whilst providing a trustee that meets each clients specific needs
5 August 2024
We are a trustee team numbering over 18 professionals (and growing) with a breadth of diverse experience and knowledge.
by Sue Lawrence 29 May 2024
The view of an EO sale, from our experience as an Independent Trustee
by Independent Directors and Trustees 27 March 2024
Balancing leadership incentives with all employee profit sharing is tricky but achievable, and can bring benefits for all. Following a recent webinar, IDT provides some thought provoking insights.
by Independent Directors and Trustees 31 January 2024
Reflecting back on our first 5 years developing our proposition and sharing our knowledge
by Sue Lawrence 26 January 2024
Employee Ownership is increasingly popular in the UK. Here we answer questions on the role of the independent trustee.
by Independent Directors and Trustees 12 January 2023
What are the things you wish you'd known when you were first appointed as a director?
Show More
Share by: