Virtual AGMs – Are they here to stay? 

Sue Lawrence • 5 June 2020

Current AGMs are largely hybrid meetings combining small scale physical meetings with virtual attendees. But could they become the new normal for future AGMs?

Many companies have found solutions for holding formal company meetings during the period of lockdown, whether this is virtual meetings, hybrid meetings incorporating some virtual communications, written resolutions or, for those hoping not to have to implement change, postponing meetings for as long as possible. Alongside this, legislation throughout the world has been adjusted or relaxed to accommodate Covid-19 related changes. What has been evident is that the use of virtual meetings based around electronic communications has been adopted extensively.

Virtual meetings have long been held for internal or purely operational meetings of directors and executives as they enable efficient and effective meetings to be held without participants, who are often geographically dispersed, having to travel to attend a physical meeting. Technology has developed considerably over the past decade to accommodate effective communication and this type of formal connectivity.

However, the drive to utilise technology for larger gatherings, specifically AGMs where a broad range of shareholders and stakeholders are brought together *, has long been discussed, but only infrequently applied. Barriers to the implementation of virtual meetings have been thrown up, including legal restrictions, a perceived lack of shareholder acceptance, practical issues in terms of voting and the potential resultant inability to challenge boards and executives on their actions.

The current global situation, with many countries implementing social distancing and/or restrictions on meetings of more than a small number of people, have meant that companies have had to adapt their standard annual meeting approach. This is particularly evident in those companies who have a formal deadline to hold a meeting within a certain time period of the end of their financial year end. In the UK, a public company with a financial year end of 31st December has a requirement to have their annual accounts approved by their shareholders at an AGM within 6 months of the year end, with the same requirement for private companies being 9 months. These deadlines have meant that companies have had to adapt their plans during this, the UK public listed company AGM season, to reflect a myriad of imposed requirements.

Attending a recent webinar from The Chartered Governance Institute (a global network with 9 local institutes in countries throughout the world) on this topic, where practitioners shared their experience of rearranging large-scale AGMs, it was evident that companies are finding effective solutions to ensuring that they can continue to fulfill their obligations with governance experts adapting to the current requirements, whether this is to incorporate social distancing measures or to implement virtual meetings. Some core lessons were shared on achieving quorum, generating questions before the meeting, sharing the status and outlook for the business through statements and videos, as well as demonstrating continued commitment to having physical meetings in the future. (A recording of this insightful webinar is due to be shared on their website at: https://www.cgiglobal.org/ )

What should be remembered is that the AGM is a meeting with two primary purposes. One is to get the operational business of the company approved through the adoption of resolutions presented to shareholders. The other is to enable shareholders to hold the board and executive to account for their actions. The former is relatively straight-forward to accommodate in a virtual meeting, unless there are any contentious resolutions. The latter, which is arguably the most important purpose, is more difficult to incorporate. Submission of questions by shareholders before the meeting can initiate some discussion and feedback but is unlikely to create a robust discussion or enable effective challenge.

Best practice seems to have been the commitment to hold a shareholder meeting later in the year when it can be held physically with the primary purpose of enabling shareholders to question and challenge boards and executives on their actions, strategy and future plans. Given the current disruption that has impacted on companies, either positively or negatively financially, but in all cases significantly with regard to operations and activity, being able to share the view from the board of the future of the business with shareholders is surely an imperative that any effective board should seek to have.

It has been noted that the majority of AGMs are attended by retail investors seeking a connectivity with the companies they have invested in. Whilst there is representation by institutional investors, these large-scale investors also have the ability to speak directly with the company outside of the meeting, at the request of either party. This direct contact means that their views are already known to companies and can be accommodated in actions, communications and expectations around voting. Virtual meetings for these shareholders can be seen as formalities, rather than a key touchpoint during the financial year.

The real benefit of the AGM then is to hear the view of the breadth of retail shareholders who may hold relatively few shares by percentage but, by their actions as consumers, may have a broader impact on the success of the company. The views of the wider stakeholder community can also be added, especially for companies that have a direct impact on communities, whether locally or globally. It is particularly in these companies that the ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) agenda is so important and where recent global activism surrounding climate change has been so vocal. Whilst it may be tempting for boards to avoid or downplay the opportunity for these views to be publicly heard, the alternative may drive these stakeholders to seek other avenues to challenge companies and their executives. In fact, having an AGM enables this section to have the opportunity to vocalise their opinions and any board should welcome and be able to respond to these.

One view that has favoured virtual meetings is that, where discussions may be contentious or there may be a visible group with a focused agenda, the views of the silent minority, or even the silent majority, may be lost in the noise. Having a virtual meeting with questions asked ahead of the meeting enables all questions to be received, considered and responded to, no matter their source, topic or the volume of the questioner.

What is the Likely Future for Virtual AGMs?

The consensus view is that the current forced requirement to review how meetings can be held has enabled discussions that have been held over many years to be crystalised. Hybrid meetings have become the norm in the current AGM season with those still to come seeking to implement them rather than await the potential reversion back to normality.

Actions have been taken to amend Articles where needed to allow for virtual meetings. The ability to have a quorum through minimum attendance and proxies has been ascertained and adopted. Pro-active requests for questions prior to the meeting have been implemented, and shareholders have responded positively. Resolutions have been shared prior to the meeting as usual, but with greater emphasis on lodging votes prior to the meeting.

All of these actions can easily be continued in the future to the benefit of the business, either in their entirety or in part.

Where there is clearly a residual requirement for a physical meeting is for the shareholder connectivity and the ability for the board and stakeholders to meet and exchange views. In the future, the opportunity for this for the wider shareholder community to meet needs to be maintained. If the only discussion with shareholders is via the privileged access that major institutional shareholders receive, then the board and executives are not getting the benefit of a broader perspective. This is particularly important in those companies with a breadth of retail investors and/or who’s customer base is the individual consumer.

If the follow up physical meetings are a success post lock-down, they may become the norm for shareholder interaction and could relegate the AGM to being a formality of approvals of resolutions. In this scenario it could easily be seen that AGMs are held virtually whilst shareholder meetings, in an alternative format, are held separately. The consideration then should be when the shareholder meetings are held and whether one per year is sufficient. For example, should contentious resolutions be shared for discussion with shareholders at a meeting so their views can be accommodated? Given the board is acting on behalf of shareholders, you would expect the views of shareholders, especially those that are in contrast to the board, should be at least discussed, even if not accommodated in their entirety. Should the forward-looking strategy of the business become a stand-alone meeting with shareholders to encourage discussion and wider opinions and views?

With the increase focus on ESG by many companies, non-AGM meetings may be a preferred solution as the stakeholder voice gains more traction and companies recognise more directly their impact on society and the environment around them. Hopefully this will also be a way for those companies who, many as a result of Covid-19, have consciously recognised their wider impact on society as being a core element to their business model and ultimate success, to maintain this connection. By continuing to seek the views of stakeholders as well as the broad shareholder group, they can continue their ESG focus beyond the crisis to the benefit of the company, as well as the society in which they act.

So are virtual AGMs here to stay? I hope so for the practicalities but only with alternative methods being introduced and maintained to facilitate shareholder and stakeholder interaction outside of the AGM and beyond lead institutional investors.


* A video on holding hybrid AGMs from the Hong Kong Institute of Chartered Secretaries in August 2018 is an interesting 3 minute watch especially with the benefit of hindsight.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqzty6DBX-8&feature=youtube.be

The Chartered Governance Institute has published new guidance on what constitutes good practice in the conduct of virtual board and committee meetings which can be found on their website at:

https://www.icsa.org.uk/knowledge/resources/good-practice-for-virtual-board-and-committee-meetings




Latest EO Sector statistics published on EO Day 2025
20 June 2025
Latest EO Sector statistics published on EO Day 2025
by Barry Matheson 19 June 2025
Culture really does matter - in this article the author invites EO leaders to think about culture by asking five key questions.
by Ruth Baker 21 May 2025
The author, Ruth Baker, considers how her own journey into EO underpins her value as an independent trustee and shapes her perspective when working with transitioning companies
In an increasingly competitive market, can EO be a differentiator?
14 May 2025
In an increasingly competitive market, can Employee Ownership be a differentiator that could be leveraged?
14 April 2025
Employee ownership can represent a transformative opportunity for businesses to align the interests of their workforce and leadership, fostering shared commitment and long-term stability. By prioritizing the principles of collaboration and mutual investment, companies can unlock tangible benefits that extend far beyond the financial. To generate full benefit from EO there needs to be clarity of purpose and future direction, as well as an understanding across all employees of both the potential benefits as well as the expectation of their contribution. Here we identify a few of the advantages of EO. Driving Engagement and Commitment One of the standout advantages of employee ownership is the way it empowers employees. When they hold a meaningful stake in the company, their day-to-day work directly contributes to its success, creating a stronger sense of accountability and purpose. This commitment often translates into higher engagement levels, as employees feel personally invested in achieving goals and driving innovation. Key to delivering against this is explaining where and how each individual, and their role can, and does, make a difference. Building Resilience for Economic Challenges Employee-owned companies are uniquely positioned to navigate economic uncertainties. The shared ownership model fosters a collective spirit that can strengthen a business’s ability to adapt and endure. Resilience is built not just through financial stability, but through the unity and determination of a workforce working toward common objectives. This resilience will not mean that tough decisions will not have to be made, but it should mean that such decisions are made from a wider perspective than pure financials. As such, these businesses are more likely to weather external impacts without resorting to lay-offs or shrinkage. Attracting Talent and Retaining Expertise In competitive industries, the promise of employee ownership can serve as a compelling incentive for recruitment and retention. Offering equity or ownership stakes sets businesses apart, providing a tangible demonstration of their commitment to employee welfare and growth. For those seeking long-term career opportunities, employee ownership usually translates into offering in role development and investment in people, making it an attractive proposition. Strategies for Effective Implementation To make the most of employee ownership, businesses must focus on several key strategies: Embedding a Collaborative Culture : Encouraging open dialogue and transparent communications reinforces the principles of ownership, driving both engagement and innovation. Educating Employees : Ongoing education and training ensure employees are equipped to make meaningful contributions to the company’s performance, and commit to a long-term commitment to stay. Strategic Goal Alignment : Clearly defined goals that align with business goals can help employees and leadership work harmoniously toward shared objectives. Monitoring Performance : Using metrics to track the impact of employee ownership ensures businesses can refine their approach over time, identifying further opportunities and maximizing benefits for all. A Model for Sustainable Success Leveraging employee ownership is not just about reshaping company structures - it’s about fostering a new mindset, one that prioritizes collaboration, resilience, and shared prosperity. By embracing this model, businesses can position themselves as leaders in sustainable growth, innovation, and employee empowerment. If you would like to benefit from the combined experience and knowledge of IDT and its members, consider appointing one of our trustees as your independent trustee. Whatever stage of EO you are at, whether you are a large or small organisation, are seeking your first, or a new or additional, independent trustee, we are sure we have somebody who could work with you for the benefit of your EO business. If you would like to know more, or would like to schedule a confidential, no strings, chat about your independent trustee requirements, please email info@directorsandtrustees.co.uk
by Tony Marks 8 April 2025
Through personal knowledge, the author, Tony Marks , considers how his perspective as an entrepreneur and vendor of a business sold into employee ownership, shapes his perspective and his contribution as an independent trustee. What is your professional background, and how does it inform your approach as a trustee? I have 30 years of Board experience, working for organisations as large as BT PLC and as small as the two start-ups which I grew and subsequently sold - the most recent sale being to an Employee Ownership Trust. I have a commercial background with sales and marketing experience, as well as subject matter expertise in project management, including authoring and co-authoring books in this field. Academically I have an MBA, am Chartered Manager (CMgr) and a Fellow of both the Chartered Management Institute (FCMI) and The Association for Project Management (FAPM). This practical and theoretical knowledge and understanding supports my contributions to the trust boards on which I am appointed, as well as my interactions with the leadership teams in these EO companies. Apart from understanding what it takes to start and build companies with multi-million-pound revenues, I have been through the EO journey successfully as a Vendor - obtaining the full market value of the company I and my co-founders created, whilst propelling the company into an exciting new phase of high growth that benefits all the employees now and in the future. Through this journey I gained an unrivalled understanding of the art of balancing the needs of vendors and the needs of employees. This can and needs to be a win-win equation, ensuring that the vendors get paid for the value they have created, whilst ensuring the long-term sustainability of the business and security of employment for the employees. Where do you add most value to a trust board? The Independent Trustee has a unique role in balancing the needs of the Vendors until they have been fully paid and ensuring the long-term sustainability of the business and employee engagement in the business they now own. This can and should be mutually beneficial. This role needs the experience of someone who has been on the full journey , understands the issues that can arise, and promotes the constructive and inclusive approach needed to complete the journey successfully. My background and experience in governance roles, within businesses, EO Trusts and Academia, brings a unique insight to any EOT. Understanding the difference between governance and management responsibilities is key to guiding new Trustees in their role. By helping develop a positive and constructive spirit between vendors, management and employees working collaboratively , I bring a tangible additional value to any EOT as an Independent Trustee. My experience with several EOTs, alongside my membership of IDT, also ensures that the statutory responsibilities of the EOT and adherence to the Trust Deed and other relevant legal documents are maintained. How do you view Employee Ownership? Employee Ownership isn’t for everyone. I believe in ‘ Good EO ’ – doing it for the right reasons and for the benefit of all parties. This philosophy is fundamental to what I believe makes EO work successfully. Put simply, employees who feel like they co-own the business they work in are more engaged in delivering within their business and making it great. This leads to improved efficiencies, greater commitment and an inclusive team-based approach to problem solving. Of course, management is still running the business but sharing the challenges and business strategy and linking this to individual and team contributions make an incredible difference to business performance. Engaged employee owners will see gradually improving benefits, beyond the tax-free bonus permitted by HMRC, when the business is performing well. Vendors who believe in Good EO can unleash the full potential of the employee-owners by engaging them in the business mission. This can lead to early re-payment, improved terms and conditions and a stronger business into the future. EO is a unique environment where everyone can, and should, win. The IDT Difference IDT supports independent trustees to recognise, value, use and share their own unique personal experience and expertise in delivering in their role for clients. Our in-house EO Toolkit supports our trustees by providing practical tools, materials and knowledge to enable them to be an invaluable partner on the trust boards to which they are appointed whilst ensuring that they have the EO knowledge needed to deliver in the role. Our in-house trustee networking, centered around monthly knowledge sharing, enables our trustees to share their knowledge and challenges with each other to gain from the collective expertise available by being part of our network. Tony is one of our vendors working as independent trustees through IDT, all bringing their unique perspective, experience, knowledge and personality to their appointments, as well as an ability to share their knowledge in an advisory and consultative manner. To find out more about the breadth of this knowledge, as well as that of our other independent trustees, read our article introducing our trustees: : https://www.independentdirectorsandtrustees.co.uk/who-are-our-trustees The Author Tony Marks is a project management expert, author of books on the topic and an experienced board member. He transitioned his own business to employee ownership in 2018 and is about to step down as a Founder Trustee. He works with IDT clients as their independent trustee across England and Scotland.
7 April 2025
Successful employee ownership (EO) succession requires balancing continuity with careful planning and preparation. The process should maintain business stability while gradually transitioning responsibilities. A clearly defined and communicated purpose, set of values, and ownership model can guide the organization through the change, ensuring alignment and clarity for both founders and new leaders. Here we introduce some key themes, emerging developments and related actions to help navigate this process: Key Themes 1. The Importance of a Common Purpose: Define a guiding framework for the business: Purpose: The overarching reason for the company’s existence. Values: Core principles that drive decisions and behaviours. Ownership Model: How employee ownership functions in the organization. Document the company’s purpose, aspirations, and history to maintain continuity and preserve the legacy of founders. Video recordings can be a practical way to capture this. 2. Maintaining Continuity: The succession process should aim to feel like “business as usual.” A rolling 5-year plan provides structure and flexibility to adapt as needed. Customer relationships and operational stability must be prioritized during transitions to ensure minimal disruption. 3. Gradual Transition with a Long-Term Break: A transitional phase that incorporates a long-term break of a few months allows founders to step back while remaining available to provide support. During this period: Some employees may step up without he Founders influence being in place; Some employees may opt out of leadership roles, as not all staff may want or be suited for leadership. Founders can still be available if needed but, crucially, should not step in unless requested; Founders can start to practically envisage, and plan for, their future after they leave, building their personal enthusiasm for their own future outside the business. 4. Thorough Succession Planning: Begin planning well before the transition, identifying gaps in roles such as sales, innovation, HR, admin, and regulatory tasks. Recruitment and development should focus on filling these gaps and preparing the next generation of leaders. The long-term break is an opportunity to test and refine the decision-making process and ensure new leaders are supported. 5. Founders’ Role Post-Succession: Founders must prepare for life outside the business by identifying new pursuits or roles to transition into. The transition is smoother when founders have a clear path forward, reducing the temptation to interfere in day-to-day operations. 6. Avoid Incentive Misalignment: Avoid introducing new incentive plans that could complicate the succession process or undermine the purpose-driven ethos of EO; If implementing leadership incentives, ensure they are aligned to clear deliverables, are flexible enough to incorporate new appointees, and don’t include those who are not in a leadership or significant role; Ensure any historical favouritism is left behind on transition. 7. Preserving Culture and Legacy: Record the history and stories of the company and its founders to maintain a sense of heritage and identity; Identify the core values that define the company; Don’t set it all in stone, elements of this need to be able to flex and change as the business evolves. Emerging Developments 1. Balancing Leadership Expectations: Succession plans must account for varying levels of interest and capability among employees, acknowledging that not all will aspire to leadership. 2. Founder Involvement as Advisors: Founders can remain involved in non-operational capacities, such as chairing the trading board, whilst empowering the new leadership to run the business. 3. Pragmatic Planning: Succession plans should address practical gaps, such as regulatory compliance or administrative tasks, which founders may have managed in an ad hoc manner. 4. Gap Filling: Be prepared to fill gaps if employees loyal to the Founder choose to move on at the same time and take this as an opportunity to review and refresh the skills needed in the future business. 5. Vision Alignment: Ensure that all employees are aligned with the company’s Common Purpose helps smooth the transition and fosters a shared sense of contribution and alignment to the future business. EO succession is a logistical, cultural and personal transition. A clear Common Purpose, detailed planning, and phased implementation ensures continuity and stability. Founders must embrace a supportive but hands-off role, empowering new leaders while preserving their legacy. By prioritizing clarity, alignment, and gradual handover, businesses can navigate the complexities of succession with minimal disruption and long-term success. Amongst our independent trustees we have founders who have successfully transitioned their businesses to employee ownership and now share their experiences through their activities as independent trustees. If you would like to benefit from the combined experience and knowledge of IDT and its members, through the appointment of an IDT independent trustee or if you would like to know more, please email info@directorsandtrustees.co.uk
by Andrew Bretherton 24 March 2025
In its first budget announcement after its election victory in 2024, the Labour government increased the rates of capital gains tax (CGT) in relation to the sale of shares but has maintained CGT relief for sales to EOTs. This is good news for employees as well as business owners who will continue to benefit from tax free sale proceeds provided they comply with the qualifying conditions. However, a number of changes were announced in relation to EOTs that are currently being finalised and, once confirmed, will be back-dated to take effect from 30 October 2024: HMRC reporting requirements Tax advisers for the selling shareholders are now required to include more information to claim CGT relief on the sale proceeds including the number of employees of the target company at the time of disposal and the purchase price payable. Control of EOT Selling shareholders (and persons connected to them) are now prevented from directly or indirectly controlling the EOT, either as chair or through a majority of members of the trust company. This is expected to result in the appointment of more independent trustees and employee representatives to trust company boards. No similar restriction has been placed on the selling shareholders in respect of the trading company. EOT tax residency The trustees of the EOT must now reside in the UK at the time of disposal, so no offshore trusts permitted. Market value Trustees must take “all reasonable steps” to ensure that the purchase price paid for the target company is “no more than market value”. Independent valuations are therefore recommended, as is appointing trustees early in the process so they can properly consider and take appropriate actions. A second valuation for trustee validation may be beneficial in certain circumstances. Tax treatment for EOT expenses The government has confirmed that contributions made by the trading company to the Trust in order to pay the selling shareholder for their shares will not be treated as distributions for tax purposes. This would include associated Stamp Duty, any interest payable at a reasonable commercial rate and Trust expenses. This would only apply if the consideration paid by the trustees for the shares does not exceed the market value for those shares (see above). Extension of “vendor clawback period” The government has extended the period in which HMRC may withdraw CGT relief for the sale proceeds to the end of the fourth tax year following the end of the tax year of disposal of the target company if a “disqualifying event” takes place. In effect, any onward sale of the trading company during this restricted period will crystallise a CGT liability for the vendors. Tax free bonuses The government has confirmed that tax-free bonuses of up to £3,600 per employee may now be awarded to all participating employees without directors being included. This ensures that non-payment of company bonuses to vendors who remain as a company director will no longer breach the equality requirements. This is the only measure included that is applicable to EOTs that were in place prior to 30 October 2024. Conclusion The previous government consulted on many of these changes so they were not unexpected, but it is important to fully understand the proposed changes to avoid a disqualifying event which may lead to withdrawal of your CGT relief. These changes do provide clarity on Employee Ownership as a viable exit solution with preferential tax treatment compared to a trade sale or private equity investment. However, sales to EOTs are not a solution for a company already in financial distress. A version of this article was originally published in November 2024 by Keystone Law https://www.keystonelaw.com/keynotes/what-changes-are-being-introduced-for-employee-ownership-trusts . The author, Andrew Bretherton, is a corporate lawyer with Keystone Law, and an independent trustee with IDT.
by Craig Carey 14 March 2025
A trustee perspective from Craig Carey on why effective communication is so important, especially in an EO business
by IDT 2 March 2025
How defining company values can be beneficial, and how they can underpin positive EO culture
Show More