In March 2024, IDT hosted a webinar introducing the various leadership incentives schemes that are available, specifically in an Employee Owned company. Led by the PWC incentives team, the presentation gave background on the various schemes possible, and how these can be incorporated into a wider all employee profit share structure.
Why does this matter for trustees?
As trustees, our principal role is as shareholder, with an oversight to ensure that the company protects and increases the value of the shares of the company, however that value is defined, whether financial or otherwise. A large part of this is ensuring that the leadership team are effective in their role, and are incentivised to deliver benefit for all employees.
So isn’t developing a financially based leadership incentive scheme contrary to this profit share to all?
The key is to ensure that those with leadership incentives are also tasked with delivering greater value for the business that wouldn’t otherwise be available. Identifying what their expertise is, and what the aligned deliverables are. By encouraging this, all employees benefit through enhanced value and availability of profit to share. Critically, leadership incentives should not be in isolation of aligned employee benefit.
Key Questions to Ask
So what are the key questions that should be asked?
Equity Based Schemes
Although the shares are held by the trustee as a majority shareholder, there are possibilities for an equity based scheme to be structured, as long as the trusts’ majority shareholding is protected.
Equity based schemes can be tax efficient ways of incentivizing leaders, whilst also ensuring that the cost to the business isn’t prohibitive. Their implementation and the relevant applicable taxation model comes with conditions largely based on company assets, size, number of employees and legal structure. Note that being employee owned is not a barrier to implementing an equity based scheme, but it does require specific considerations.
Trigger events, or exercise options, can be included prior to full payment of any vendor loan or deferred consideration. Whilst good leaver provisions can be incorporated to incentivise those with an expected shorter tenure, as can conditions aligned to long-term sustainable company growth.
Cash Based Schemes
Not all schemes have to be equity based, and within an EO company, it may be preferable to not dilute shares to multiple holders.
Cash based schemes provide a lot more flexibility and can easily incorporate bespoke performance conditions or payment dates. They also have the benefit of being easy to administer and can sit alongside other schemes in place, including EO profit sharing.
In an EO company still within its vendor loan repayment term, being able to incentivise through cash payments before repayment of the loan, with a greater distribution after the loan has been repaid, can help to even out the balance sheet, and encourage leaders to remain with the business after the vendor loan has been repaid.
If the business increases its profit above the original expectations under the repayment schedule, this may also encourage leaders to seek to repay the loan early thus freeing the vendors to their new life, reducing the cost of the financial repayments to the business, and directing profits to leadership and employees.
Scheme Purpose?
Be very clear on what the purpose of the scheme is and ensure this is incorporated into its terms.
Examples include incentivizing rising leaders of the future, using the scheme to incentivize leaders to develop their successors, or ensuring that staging points allow for new members to join. This can then be part of succession development of the next tier down in the organisation.
Where a leadership team may be of an age similar to that of the vendors, consider adding trigger points where members can take out from the scheme, for example as good leavers on retirement.
Scheme Timelines
Depending on the purpose of the scheme, various trigger points, or staging points, can be incorporated. These don’t have to be time based. They could instead be aligned to hitting identified profit margins and targets.
Be creative in a way that delivers for the business. But aim to be simple to monitor, easy to implement, and flexible enough to adjust for future known, and unknown, events, such as new joiners, expansion or contraction.
Complexity and Transparency
Wherever possible, keep the scheme simple – to administer, calculate and pay out.
The time and resource taken to administer, review and apply the scheme can become extensive if it is not well structured and documented at the outset - time that is better spent delivering for the business.
Also, consider any other incentivisation or contribution schemes may be in place. Review existing, or new, success fees, sales bonuses, and other incentivisation schemes across the business, not just employee profit sharing. Can the company afford all these schemes, has time created more complexity, how do they interact with each other, do any individuals get multiple benefit, and how will they be administered?
Too often post EO transition schemes are a continuation of what is already in place or deliver on a desire to compensate those individuals closest to the vendors, compensating them for their loyalty rather than future delivery under the new ownership structure. Care should be taken to ensure that all schemes deliver for the future, under its new EO ownership structure, and for the benefit of all employees. The transition to EO is a great opportunity to reflect, review and refresh what incentivisation at all levels looks like under the company’s new ownership.
If you would like to know more about EO incentivisation schemes, or to receive a copy of the webinar slides, contact IDT at info@directorsandtrustees.co.uk