Blog Post

Remuneration Committees during Covid-19

Sue Lawrence • 17 April 2020

Following on from the article on utilising the expertise around you, this article focuses on the role of the remuneration committee in a Covid-19 world


Crisis management may not specifically be in the terms of reference of most fixed term committees of a board, let alone the remuneration committee. However, given the current times we’re living in, and the significant impact not only on individual companies but the economy as a whole, it would be disappointing if this committee wasn’t actively discussing the topic in rapidly convened virtual meetings.

With large numbers of employees being put on furlough and companies taking funding from the government as a result, there has been even more focus on those companies that pay high salaries and bonuses to their senior executives. The remuneration committee leads and oversees this and, under the FRC Corporate Governance Code (the “Code”) has a responsibility for determining the policy for executive director remuneration’. It should also ‘review workforce remuneration and related policies and the alignment and rewards with culture’.

The Code states that “Remuneration policies and practices should be designed to support strategy and promote long-term sustainable success. Executive remuneration should be aligned to company purpose and values, and be clearly linked to the successful delivery of the company’s long-term strategy.”

It could also be argued that it should be linked to the long term success of the country given the heavy toll on government finances that is currently being seen.

Where companies have a remuneration committee, or have a sub-group of the board reviewing executive remuneration, there is an obligation to recognise the urgency of the situation and identify areas where either temporary or longer term adjustments and contributions can be made.

Public opinion has turned against those high flying individuals taking huge salaries whilst their colleagues are being put on furlough, and key workers continue to function under incredible pressure. Professional footballers, usually the darlings of a football focused public, have seen increased pressure to react, whilst bank CEOs have taken short-term pay and bonus cuts.

Remuneration committees are, presumably, not waiting to be asked to convene an extraordinary committee meeting to discuss what their executive and company should be considering and doing. If they’re not, you have to consider how comfortable it is for them to be sitting on their hands whilst the world is changing. Equally, if they are advising change and being ignored or deferred, there has to be a consideration as to whether the company is paying lip service to a group of expert individuals rather than benefiting from their advice.

Given the seniority and vast experience of the members of remuneration committees, hopefully they’re not waiting to be directed or hiding behind the detail of the terms of reference of their committee. It’s important that there is a clear direction and framework for the work of this group in normal times, but this is anything but normal.

The Chartered Governance Institute model terms of reference for remuneration committees (January 2020) includes the following duties:

Design remuneration policies and practices to support strategy and promote long-term sustainable success, with executive remuneration aligned to company purpose and values, clearly linked to the successful delivery of the company’s long-term strategy, and that enable the use of discretion to override formulaic outcomes and to recover and/or withhold sums or share awards under appropriate specified circumstances.

Now is surely a time to be looking at overriding formulaic outcomes and seeking to recover and/or withhold sums for the benefit of the wider business.

There is also a requirement to be mindful of the views not only of shareholders but also stakeholders. This latter surely includes the wider society. There have been some comments made to justify leaving remuneration untouched. For example, that the continuation of payment supports the economy through tax revenues that are higher than the cost of furloughing colleagues. Surely there should be some pause for thought about how there can be a shared contribution to the situation in some way, even if this is only financial or physical through self exclusion, rather than continuing to protect the riches of the few.

It could be argued that the remuneration committee largely has a reactive role considering executive remuneration and reviewing workforce remuneration and policies. However, given the members’ presumably have relevant and broad experience in the field of individual motivation and alignment to strategy, this is a forum that should be at the forefront of working with HR experts on finding equitable solutions that are fit for the new world, where proactive organisations are recognizing their wider responsibility outside their own success.

It is becoming evident which companies have recognised their responsibilities and picked up on this new world environment and its drivers. Whether it is the executive themselves, their remuneration committee or external pressure, it’s good to see large organizations starting to address the inequalities in their remuneration, albeit temporarily.

In a post Covid-19 world, it will be interesting to see whether executive remuneration remains more closely aligned to the success of the external economies in which the organisation sits and will continue to be more closely linked to the remuneration of the wider workforce. It will also be interesting to see whether remuneration committees have proved their value during this turbulent time and whether their influence and role will be altered as a result.


22 January 2025
Agulhas Applied Knowledge was founded in January 2003 and became employee owned in December 2020. Here Nigel Thornton , one of the 3 founder vendors, kindly shares his journey to making the decision to sell to an EOT, and beyond to its current position as an EOT, B-Corp certified company with the founders stepping back and a new leadership team in place. Why did you originally decide to sell to an EOT, and do you now believe that it was the right decision? I haven't regretted the choice to sell Agulhas to an EOT for one minute. Many years before we made the decision, we had talked to other founders of companies similar to ours, and heard how they were all struggling with the challenge of transition. I knew for a long time that we would have to come to a point where we did sell. We had three choices; the first was to wind the company down. The second was to look for a buyer, probably to a much larger company. And the third, thanks to the 2014 act, was the option to sell to the employees through the mechanism of an EOT. After living and breathing Agulhas for many years, the idea of winding down just didn't seem right, so we looked at the second two options more carefully. Once the three founders talked to others about selling out to a larger company (and we’d had some interest), or getting a venture capital injection, we realized it wasn’t an attractive option for us. We would end up doing the bidding of the buyer through the workout period, being vulnerable, really, to the new owners’ whims. A buyer would likely fire most of the staff, retaining only the seniors, and the company would be gone. From companies that had got venture capital funds we’d seen we’d be forced to grow rapidly to meet an investor’s requirements and become driven by the bottom line. In both these cases, what we'd created that was unique about Agulhas would be lost. We didn't want that to happen. So it became clear fairly quickly that the choice to sell to an EOT seemed best. It meant that the company could work effectively on the kind of things that we've always thought important. The culture of the company would be maintained. We could evolve from where we were rather than be forced to change. And actually it was better than that. It wasn’t the best worst option, quite the reverse. Soon after we made the choice to go for an EOT, and began working through what it meant, we realised that doing so was indeed consistent with our values. It was an expression of who we already were and the founders’ beliefs. And, as its worked out, I think we’ve found that for Agulhas, becoming an EOT was not as great a step as it might have been culturally, or practically. What stage is the Company at now, and what is your ongoing involvement, if any? We’re four years into our EOT life, and about halfway through the payoff of the deferred consideration. It’s gone slower that we’d hoped as our main client is the UK Government and there’s been a lot of disruption to our expected cashflow since December 2020 when we became an EOT. I've handed over being the CEO to Lauren Pett who had been our Chief Operating Officer. We did it in a very Agulhas way, evolving and having a phased process of her taking over. Since we became an EOT, the role of the staff has been strengthened through what we call the Co-Owners Forum (COF). This is still evolving, with informal and more formal working groups aligned to both areas of strategic priority for the company, and themes important to the staff. And the EOT has driven us to put in place more structured governance. We’re in the process of further developing the leadership roles in the company - what the oversight of the company board and the Trust Board means in practice - to ensure that there is a robust architecture to go forward towards and beyond Freedom Day. That’s meant a structured change to the roles that the three founders have, with us more clearly taking an oversight role through the board of Directors and the Trust Board, rather than day to day running of the company. Together with one of the other co-founders, Catherine Cameron, I’ve gone down to a four-day week. That’s for the good of us and the company, and is a deliberate internal and external signal. Beyond the CEO functions, one of the things that has enabled me to step back is the fact that we've employed people who can take on key tasks I used to do, for instance, finance and IT. I think its not unusual that if a company has grown around you, a founder ends up being a Jack or Jill of all trades. And a key thing for me is I’ve stepped out of managing our biggest client, which I’d done for over a decade. Such stepping back is the right thing to do, although doing so can be hard, it is important. When somebody asks me to do something, I’m finding myself saying, well, actually, that's not my problem anymore, go and ask so and so, it’s their job. It takes a while to get people used to that (and people still find it difficult sometimes) but, as a founder, you’ve been the last person that everybody looks to for so long it’s a hard habit for everyone to break. What have been the challenges since the transition, from your perspective as a Founder? I think when you have spent many, many years being where the buck stops, it's hard then not to think of you yourself in that role anymore. Just because it's habit, you think you are responsible for solving things because, actually, you have been responsible for solving things! You've woken up at three o'clock in the morning because it has been your responsibility to worry about whatever the company is facing, be it a cash flow issue or a delivery issue or a sticky relationship with a key client. So the first thing you've got to do is actually change where your head is at. And that's been a challenge for me. So I’ve needed to change my headspace, and also my actions. It also takes time for people to believe you when you say you aren’t going to be around forever and that you do want to step back. I think it's also a difficulty, or certainly one that I've had, which is to know when to say something and when not to say something, when to intervene and when not to intervene. You've got to let the new leadership take the decisions. And sometimes those decisions are not going to be the same as that you would have made, and sometimes there are going to be mistakes that you might see coming and you might warn people about, but actually they've got to go through and learn from the experience in the same way that I've learned over many years. And the best teacher is, in the end, experience. So it's important to calibrate when to keep your mouth shut, and crucially to be available to the new leadership if they want to ask you a question, ask what you think, to be helpful and supportive, so that they know that you have got their back if necessary. It’s delicate and I haven’t always got it right. The key issue for me is knowing that the company is safe; and that’s essentially about knowing that the beliefs, people and systems are sound, and that as far as possible there’s a secure commercial outlook. What have been the positive highlights that you can share with others? At each of the last three company away days, I've said a version of the same thing which is that 20 plus years ago, when we founded the company, if you had told me that Agulhas Applied Knowledge would have the number of staff we have, our diversity, the level of energy and interest they show in the work, and that we would have a portfolio that is as wide and interesting (and if I may say as influential) as we have, I probably wouldn't have believed you. We founded Agulhas because (apart from probably being unemployable by anyone else!) we wanted to do interesting and impactful work. We never set out as the founders to create a company that Agulhas has become. A lot of the recent change is down to the energy of our CEO, Lauren, along with the rest of our team, and the energy and creativity that being an EOT engenders. They and us have built on the foundations we created. And Agulhas has become something bigger than me or the founders; it's beyond us, and that is fantastic. The employee ownership trust creates a whole new dynamism and crystallizes the company as no longer about who we are, but about the collective energy and commitment of the entire workforce of Agulhas, our beliefs, values and its culture. And that is amazing. Truly amazing! As a Founder, and Seller, what advice would you give to leadership teams of an EO business? Firstly, don't rush. Set a clear direction, but realise the wheel can take time to turn. All the change, all the all the evolution of your company to be a fully fledged EOT is not going to happen overnight, and different parts of it will grow at different paces. There will be hiccups along the way. Which leads to the second point, its important therefore to start the process early and allow things to work through! My guess is that many founders start too late, often perhaps too close to the time when they should be moving on. Thirdly, don't be greedy. If you're greedy, if you want your payout early, if you want a lot of money, that's probably not a good thing. We had to slow down our deferred consideration repayment because our expected cashflow was heavily impacted, first by COVID and then by political machinations in the UK. We had to manage our payoff at a slower phase than we expected. I think those who look for too much money or want it too quickly run into trouble. Fourthly I think it's very important to be clear about the beliefs and values of the company; for us that was easy because our job has always been very clearly value driven. It's very important to get a sense of who you are as a company, your values, your culture, so that that can be shared amongst everybody. And if somebody comes into your company, its clear they're buying into that – and being an EOT is now who we are. Very soon after becoming an EOT we also applied for and became B-Corp certified (with a very high score I might say!). That was very good for us as the combination of both EOT and B Corp was a clear public declaration of what we stand for and communicated the identity of Agulhas internally and externally. Fifthly, get the governance right. That took us a bit, but we are well on the way. A long time ago as a young management consultant in one of the Big Four, I realised that most organisational problems boil down to two issues; role clarity and effective communication. Get those both right through the transition from a company that relies on the founders to one that is mature and no longer dependent on you, and you’ll not go far wrong. Agulhas Applied Knowledge was founded in January 2003 and became employee owned in December 2020. A research, evaluation, and consultancy specializing in international development and social policy, Agulhas is based in the UK working across the world with a variety of clients including governments, UN Agencies, NGOs, and international organizations. www.agulhas.co.uk Agulhas Applied Knowledge Trustee Limited has had an IDT independent trustee appointed to their trust board since July 2022.
by Shaun Goodwin 22 January 2025
A trustees perspective on why the business should come first to enable employee benefit
by IDT 16 January 2025
An effective EO governance structure that is communicated and understood can create better opportunities for everybody to contribute to the success of their company
by Sam Moles 22 November 2024
Through personal knowledge and experience, the author, Sam Moles, reflects and expands on one of the core expectations of EO - transparent communication and employee engagement.
11 October 2024
Our Trustee appointment process is designed to meet client deadlines whilst providing a trustee that meets each clients specific needs
5 August 2024
We are a trustee team numbering over 18 professionals (and growing) with a breadth of diverse experience and knowledge.
by Sue Lawrence 29 May 2024
The view of an EO sale, from our experience as an Independent Trustee
by Independent Directors and Trustees 27 March 2024
Balancing leadership incentives with all employee profit sharing is tricky but achievable, and can bring benefits for all. Following a recent webinar, IDT provides some thought provoking insights.
by Independent Directors and Trustees 31 January 2024
Reflecting back on our first 5 years developing our proposition and sharing our knowledge
by Sue Lawrence 26 January 2024
Employee Ownership is increasingly popular in the UK. Here we answer questions on the role of the independent trustee.
Show More
Share by: